970x125
Recently, someone said to me, “Everything that happens to a child is the parent’s fault.” As a parent, that statement immediately carried weight. It suggested that I was responsible not only for how my children were raised, but for every choice they have ever made, including every mistake, poor decision, or painful experience, regardless of the care, structure, values, and guidance I consistently provided. As a clinician, I recognized this as a classic example of “absolutist thinking” or cognitive distortion, where events are interpreted in black-and-white terms with no room for nuance. This type of “all-or-nothing” thinking can lead to rigid expectations, heightened stress, and emotional distress, and is commonly observed in conditions such as depression and anxiety.
What makes this form of thinking particularly harmful in the context of parenting is that it leaves no space for individuality, autonomy, or growth in children. It frames children as mere extensions of their parents rather than as developing individuals with their own agency, curiosity, and capacity to make choices. Ironically, one of the messages I often share with parents is, “You are raising adults, not babies.” This emphasizes the importance of equipping children with the tools and skills they need to function independently as adults. Absolutist blame undermines this process by implying that children’s successes and failures exist solely at the mercy of their parents, erasing the critical role of their own decision-making, environmental influences, and developmental trajectory. Recognizing the limits of parental control allows us to focus on guiding, supporting, and preparing children rather than carrying the unrealistic burden of total responsibility for every outcome.
Children Don’t Grow in a Vacuum
It also raises a critical question: How can parents be held responsible for behaviors they neither taught nor modeled? For example, when children engage in unhealthy or risky behaviors, it is tempting to search for a single cause. Parents often become the easiest target. Yet development does not occur in isolation. Decades of developmental research demonstrate that children grow within multiple, interacting systems, including family, peers, schools, community, and broader cultural contexts (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). As children grow, their behavior is increasingly shaped by peer relationships, school environments, media exposure, temperament, and life stressors, many of which lie outside a parent’s control (Steinberg, 2014). Reducing a child’s struggles to parental failure replaces complexity with blame. Blame does not promote insight or change; it produces shame. Shame shuts people down. It silences curiosity, discourages openness, and interferes with learning.
There is no blueprint for parenting, and parents do not have total control over their children’s choices. Every parent makes mistakes, often while navigating financial strain, illness, loss, trauma, or other stressors that complicate even the most thoughtful parenting. Most parents learn in real time—adjusting, recalibrating, and doing the best they can with the information and resources available. Expecting perfection, or complete control, is not only unrealistic but unsupported by developmental science (Baumrind, 1991).
Decades of research make clear that child development is shaped by multiple, interacting systems rather than a single factor (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). Parenting matters deeply, but influence is not the same as control. Children are not passive recipients of parenting; they actively interpret, resist, and respond to their environments. Reducing all outcomes, good or bad, to parental fault oversimplifies development and misrepresents what we know from research.
Blame Is Not Accountability
In my clinical work, I frequently see blame confused with accountability. They are not the same. When responsibility for a child’s behavior is placed entirely on parents, children receive an unintended message: Your choices do not fully belong to you. This framing does not protect children; it interferes with learning. Growth requires ownership. Children and adolescents need opportunities to recognize their choices and learn how to make different ones. Adolescence, in particular, is a period of heightened learning and development, marked by increased capacity for reasoning, responsibility, and change, not simply a measure of parental success or failure (Steinberg, 2014). Behavior unfolds over time, shaped by individual traits, experiences, and environments, and cannot be reduced to isolated parenting decisions (Moffitt, 1993).
What is most concerning about parental blame is how it undermines growth and how quickly it invites shame rather than reflection. Shame erodes relationships, increases defensiveness, and makes both parents and children less likely to seek support. Research consistently shows that shame-based responses undermine learning and accountability, while supportive approaches are more effective in promoting behavioral change (Moffitt, 1993).
Supporting families requires shifting away from moral judgments and toward a developmental lens. Children’s behavior reflects the interaction of biology, temperament, relationships, school contexts, and broader social forces over time (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). Parenting is a vital part of this equation, but it is not the whole equation. Reducing blame does not mean eliminating parental responsibility; it means placing that responsibility within a realistic, evidence-informed framework that supports growth rather than punishes imperfection.
Reducing the Culture of Parental Blame
From both a clinical and societal perspective, moving forward requires nuance rather than finger-pointing. More developmentally informed approaches should include:
- Replacing blame with context. When a child struggles, focus on contributing factors rather than assigning fault (Bronfenbrenner, 1979).
- Holding children accountable in developmentally appropriate ways. Accountability does not require shame; it requires opportunities to repair harm and learn from choices (Steinberg, 2014).
- Recognizing parental influence without assuming parental control. Parents shape environments and values, but outcomes are never guaranteed (Baumrind, 1991).
- Avoiding shame-based responses. Shame undermines learning and damages trust; supportive accountability fosters change (Moffitt, 1993).
- Challenging absolutist language. Statements like “everything is the parents’ fault” oversimplify development and distort responsibility.
- Supporting parents rather than scrutinizing them. Parents who feel supported are more likely to remain reflective, engaged, and emotionally available, benefiting children over time (Baumrind, 1991).
Parenting Essential Reads
Final Thoughts
Both my professional training and my experience as a parent have shown me that children do not develop in straight lines or in controlled environments. Outcomes are shaped over time through relationships, choices, and context, not through parental perfection. When we move away from blame and toward understanding, and replace shame with developmentally appropriate accountability, we create the conditions for growth that lead to lasting change.
